Clea by Antonia Wallace

 

by Colin Hamilton

Speculative Book Reviews

Writers are sometimes advised to write the book they'd most like to read.  We invite you to write the book review of a book of speculative nonfiction you wish was out there, or a book that was never written but could have been, or a lost book of which there is scant evidence, or a book to be written in a hundred years. We invite you to consider the aesthetic qualities of this book and to use the opportunity of your review to push, adhere to, or reconsider the boundaries of speculation in nonfiction, as you see them. We see these reviews as furthering the conversation this journal seeks to encourage. We invite you to have fun. The limit is the limit of your speculation. Traditional reviews of nonfiction books that utilize speculation are also welcome.


 

Among Antonia Wallace’s six largely unread books, perhaps the least appreciated and most unread is Clea, which imagines a future in which scientific leaps, anchored in gene editing, pharmaceutical precision and surgical enhancement, have allowed humans to alter any number of physical imperfections and fragilities, through which we first escape aging and ultimately the necessity of death itself, although it continues to linger, wolf-like, on the margins of society, occasionally making an unexpected, violent entry into this otherwise protected time.

In this era of dystopian obsession, a different author might imagine a world in which everyone is granted permanent youth apocalyptically. It’s not hard to project the angles: the exhaustion of natural resources that goes into sustaining endless life; the infinities of boredom that accumulate like barnacles on the years; the nihilistic thrill-seeking of the near immortal; the supremist ideology that progressively narrows the gene pool to a singular ideal of perfection. (I was just reading a review of a new book, Chana Porter’s The Seep, in which an alien entity discretely invades Earth, solving all of our problems and eliminating our humanity in the process...) The society Wallace describes, however, is mostly idyllic, and her future, by any historic standard, is a well fed and tolerant place. But.

But despite all the promise of eternal youth and a generous diet of anti-depressant-infused beef-like proteins, there are in Wallace’s future still some who fall victim to “a mind of winter” and indulge an inner compulsion not just to give into their own decline but to embrace all that it means to age and weaken, to die. These people, “the rotters” as they are called, are deeply disturbing to their robust, beautiful peers, and are perceived as another virus in their midst to be expelled, a societal glitch, a flawed algorithm.

Most are shunned and driven away like lepers of another age, but Wallace’s world retains our dual reaction to horror, both repulsion and, for some, an irrepressible compulsion to pull back the curtain. To touch it. Beneath the elegant, logical sheen of this world, a sub-culture has developed in which those who embrace their own ends become something akin to performance artists, enacting their decline in the far corners of a dark web or through secret cabarets for the entertainment of voyeurs. The most popular rotters amass cult-like followings, existing somewhere between Kafka’s “The Hunger Artist” and YouTube Svengalis.

Wallace’s story is told through the experience of Justine, an accomplished physicist who, despite her evident vim and vigor, has lived far into her second century. Intrigued by the rumors she’s heard and perhaps by some primordial stirring in her enhanced hippocampi, one night she ventures with a crowd of colleagues into one of the underground, velveteen clubs where the aging gather and the curious stray. There she sees Clea.

Generations of middle-age men in both fiction and reality have found themselves unnerved by adolescent flowering, and the story of their humiliating, doomed pursuit is one we know well. Wallace inverts this tale: restored Justine is fixated by Clea’s exotic pallor, by the unknown liver spots that, leopard-like, ascend her arms, by the charms of her dry cough, by the coarseness of her grey hair. Every description is written in a way that eroticizes Clea’s mortality, while marking Justine’s robust health as sterile, scentless and numb.

Clea,” Wallace said in an interview I found buried deep online after nearly giving up my search, “is my rejection of the cult of possibilities in favor of the hard church of difficult pleasures. I find the young exhausting, but even worse are mid-level, middle age executives wearing shorts and baseball caps or grown couples on dates at Disney movies. Homes in which ‘young adult’ fiction comprises the only dozen books, displayed beside staged family photos in matching polo shirts. I’m appalled by adults who are applauded for speaking the truth when all they’ve actually done is throw a childish tantrum. There was a time when we strove toward rites of passage, celebrated them, when we fought to be accepted as the adults we’re becoming, but increasingly I feel as though an entire generation, maybe three, would reject all the terrifying freedom of maturity for one long suck on the teat. It’s as though, given another bite of the apple, we’ve opted to Edenic ignorance instead.”

For Justine’s curiosity seeking friends, the evening’s entertainment is a daring and momentary distraction, and they quickly return to the simple lives they’d been leading, but the image of Clea in all her doomed glory has somehow attached itself to Justine and begins to infect her. In her physics journals, Justine finds herself drawn to articles about orbital, optical and particle decay, bedrocks of twentieth century thinking that her own highly praised work has called into question for their defeatist assumptions. She covers white boards with complex mathematical equations, which are meant to bring her peace but do not. She visits a spa and has the last two weeks peeled from her skin and sucked from her pores, but that little taste of death has burrowed deep. Eventually she goes back.

What she discovers is that she is far from Clea’s only suitor. In fact there are varied, equally perfect rivals – a plasticine gameshow host, a senator known for his moralistic stance against reproduction, a captain recently returned from a long space voyage two years younger than when he’d left – but there is something in Justine’s urgent need that matches Clea’s own lack of time and a surreptitious affair is sparked. While Justine is first drawn to all the unknown, forbidden secrets of Clea’s flesh, which are described in long and longing paragraphs, the more dangerous seduction is ultimately by Clea’s mortal thinking: the vitality of doing almost anything for a final time, the rare power that one amasses by being able to say “no more.” Although Justine repeatedly begs Clea to accept her protection, to allow Justine to give her life, it is her own attachment to health that unravels.

At this point, Clea devolves, unfortunately, into a very traditional, even male, perhaps colonial novel, in which Justine, as a representative of an advanced society, sets out to save the seemingly weaker, more vulnerable Other, who never emerges as a fully realized character in her own right, only to find herself ultimately corrupted by Clea’s primitive ways. “Going native,” as it were, Justine abandons the world as she knows it, and the final chapter devolves into a long, lecturing monologue, not unlike the quote above.

 

Colin Hamilton.jpg

Colin Hamilton is the author of a novel The Thirteenth Month (Black Lawrence Press), and a poetry chapbook (Kent State University Press). He is currently working on a collection of stories based on imagined books found in the discard room of a library. He has helped create a library, a center for dance, and multiple affordable housing projects for artists. He lives in St. Paul, where he runs a consulting business for nonprofits.

 

Six Impossible Things Before Breakfast

 

by Leila Philip

Speculative Book Reviews

Writers are sometimes advised to write the book they'd most like to read.  We invite you to write the book review of a book of speculative nonfiction you wish was out there, or a book that was never written but could have been, or a lost book of which there is scant evidence, or a book to be written in a hundred years. We invite you to consider the aesthetic qualities of this book and to use the opportunity of your review to push, adhere to, or reconsider the boundaries of speculation in nonfiction, as you see them. We see these reviews as furthering the conversation this journal seeks to encourage. We invite you to have fun. The limit is the limit of your speculation. Traditional reviews of nonfiction books that utilize speculation are also welcome.

We hope to publish several each issue.  Typically, we imagine these reviews to be no longer than 1000 words.  We'll be accepting reviews starting with our next submission period.




I can only speculate as to the title of this book, but I can assure you it is spectacular.[1] Specere, from the Latin, means to look and this book looks in ways that surprise, disrupt and disarm even the most begrudging of readers. The experience is like hang gliding, which I have never done, but sometimes speculate about doing. Last month when hiking up a cliff above the Oregon coast, I looked out and saw two flying things almost intersecting no more than fifteen feet out from the edge of the cliff; a bald eagle and a woman in a harness strapped like a cocoon beneath a wide green sail. She was hang gliding as easy as you please with her rippling canopy holding her in the wind. Below were jagged teeth of rock, the deadly surf roiling in, but she made graceful swoops so close to the mountain’s edge that If I had held a long pole, I could have touched her. The eagle, whose wingspan was dizzyingly wide, almost as long as the hang glider, was hunting. I could seen the keen pointed head as it lifted and fell, then the great wings also turning as easy as you please in the currents of wind. Below the waves crashed and swelled, crashed and swelled. The person I was hiking with remarked that on land you can only see 10 miles out into open ocean even on the clearest day due to the curving of the earth. He was an experienced sailor. But where we stood, almost at the crest of the cliff, he figured we were looking out a good fifty miles. Nothing but silver sheen, as if all the energy of the world was swirling in a snow globe to which someone had given a grand shake.

That feeling of being at the edge of the world, above a crashing ocean, watching a human sailing by, held by invisible rhythms of wind while a bald eagle turns in widening gyres -- that is how I would describe the experience of reading this book.

Stylistically, this book is indebted to Lewis Carroll’s White Queen, who believed six impossible things before breakfast[2]. We can speculate all day about what Lewis Carroll meant by this (and of course the hookah pipe), but this aesthetic applied to literature is wonderful to consider. My book takes a White Queen approach to language, with imaginings that leap so high they take flight.  While it is not comfortable to even speculate about the White Queen, grown obese with her own authority, flying anywhere, take her approach into language and the results are marvelous. The language in this book is made up of sentences that again and again do impossible things before breakfast. Yes!

In terms of literary genres, this book relies quite surprisingly upon the dynamics of a drab and little remarked upon genre, the parable. Specifically it makes use of the tale of the Blind Men and An Elephant, drawing upon our expectations only to turn them quite wonderfully upside down. By the time we finish we know we are in a version of Alice’s wonderland where no means yes and yes means no, and size is a matter of timing and perspective. In the classic tale of the Blind Men and An Elephant, a group of blind men encounter an elephant for the first time and attempt to describe what they see.[3] The first one, touching only the ears, says an elephant is a waving fan. The second one, touching only the trunk, (tickled as a matter of fact during his encounter by the elephant conducting his own investigation) says it is a snake. The third one, grasping only the bristly tail says it is a rope, while the fourth, feeling the hard legs announces it must be a pillar. The fifth, who feels the tusk, says the thing called an elephant is hard and smooth like a spear.  The conventional lesson of this tale is about our human tendency to claim absolute truth based on our limited experience.  Because we can only take in the world through our own circumscribed lens, we cannot see the whole picture.

This book asks us to reconsider this tale in light of speculation. How wonderfully inventive and unhindered each blind man is in his perception, how deeply and completely he trusts the idiosyncratic way he views the elephant. And finally, how definitively he creates an entirely new being through his individual act of speculation. Through the power of his speculations, an ordinary elephant (of course there is no such thing as an ordinary elephant, but never mind) becomes a fan, a snake, a pillar, a rope, a spear. There is no limit to the fabulous here and each version of speculation works because it is grounded in the real. No lazy slouches in this story, the men touch and feel with precision the little bit of elephant they have to work with. Their failure is not in their flawed perceptions, but in the limitations of their access. They work hard at observing through their hands, poking that elephant with their pinky finger, the lightest touch, only to come away stating that they have encountered a watermelon. These men engage the elephant with senses open and deduce through their senses, mostly touch, but also sound, smell and taste, the grit of empirical fact. Then, the moment of wonder, each runs those perceptions through the whirligig of his imagination.  Voila, a rope, a fan, a rock a snake, a spear where before there was only elephant.        

//

[1] Hands off. I am working on this book. I speculate as to when it will be finished.

[2] "There's no use trying," she said: "one can't believe impossible things." "I daresay you haven't had much practice," said the Queen. "When I was your age, I always did it for half-an-hour a day. Why, sometimes I've believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast."      – Through the Looking Glass, Lewis Carroll

[3]  The parable of the Blind Men and An Elephant originated in the ancient Indian Subcontinent. In contemporary physics it is considered an apt analogy for wave-particle duality.

 

Of Curses and Beauty: The Memoirs of Mario Praz

 

by Robin Hemley

Speculative Book Reviews

Writers are sometimes advised to write the book they'd most like to read.  We invite you to write the book review of a book of speculative nonfiction you wish was out there, or a book that was never written but could have been, or a lost book of which there is scant evidence, or a book to be written in a hundred years. We invite you to consider the aesthetic qualities of this book and to use the opportunity of your review to push, adhere to, or reconsider the boundaries of speculation in nonfiction, as you see them. We see these reviews as furthering the conversation this journal seeks to encourage. We invite you to have fun. The limit is the limit of your speculation. Traditional reviews of nonfiction books that utilize speculation are also welcome.

We hope to publish several each issue.  Typically, we imagine these reviews to be no longer than 1000 words.  We'll be accepting reviews starting with our next submission period.


(Farrar, Straus and Giroux, $28, 277 pp.)

“Every person I’ve known in my life, and I’d venture to include as well, all those on earth I have not been acquainted with, carry with them a curse.  My good fortune is in having known from an early age, the manifestation if not the exact reasons for my curse. The vast assemblage of humanity, by contrast, know very little of their own particular curses and spend the better part of their lives attempting to untangle curse from blessing, much like the unfortunate protagonist of James’ “The Beast in the Jungle,” the curse in his case being that he let his life slip by unacted upon.” 

So might begin this curious and ultimately moving memoir by the Italian Art historian and Literary critic, Mario Praz. An unvarnished and overt memoir would have been painful and/or too mundane for him to write, as he had previously written one of the most eccentric memoirs ever written, The House of Life, a memoir told through the possessions with which he filled his apartment in Rome. But if he had been coaxed to write another memoir, perhaps he would have found a little fascination with the attitude of others towards him, that nearly everyone in Italian society considered him portava iella, a jinx.  Known by some as “L’Anglista,” for his vast knowledge of English literature, he was most famous in academic circles worldwide for his 1933 groundbreaking study of Romanticism, “The Romantic Agony,” and for his exquisite sense of interior design, as demonstrated in his work, " An Illustrated History of Interior Decoration from Pompeii to Art Nouveau."  But in Rome, among friends, foes, and acquaintances, he was known as L’Innominabile” “the Unmentionable,” an irredeemable carrier of misfortune whose presence always brought some measure of disaster. When Maria Callas lost her voice during a performance at the Teatro dell’Opera of Bellini’s Norma, she found grim satisfaction upon learning that Professor Praz had been in the audience.  If he approached an acquaintance at a restaurant or café, as he did once the famous Zambrano sisters, Maria and Ariceli, they’d cower quietly, in direct opposition to their vibrant natures, until he moved on. 

How much did this perception weigh on him: otherwise sane and intelligent people certain he carried evil with him, all because of a congenital limp ( a sure sign of the devil)?  How did the almost gothic fascination others had with accursedness determine his scholarly fascination with the Romantics whom he blasted as immoral and decadent in their obsessions with beauty and horror. Or conversely, his own appreciation of beautiful exteriors?  Beginning his Romantic Agony with a chapter on Medusa, how much did he see himself reflected in her, his own ability to alter the life of anyone in his presence?  An Anxiety with no possibility of escape is the main theme of the Gothic tales, he wrote.  Describing these anxieties and resisting them was in some fashion his life’s work.  In surrounding himself with beautiful objects that carried memories of his life for him, he created one memoir.  In writing about the Romantics and their free-floating anxieties that sought expression in the supernatural, he wrote in a sense another “covert autobiography” (as John Russell called The House of Life in an article in The New York Times shortly after Praz’ death in 1982). 

The missing fork of this trident of memoirs is the one he might have written perhaps titled, The Anxiety Catcher or The Unmentionable: A Memoir or Of Curses and Beauty.   

Let’s say this curious book exists, though only in manuscript form, typed a year before Praz’ death. If you go looking for this book you might or might not find it, but you will certainly find him, or at least one branch of his autobiography at the Mario Praz Museum, brimming with the furnishings and books that soothed his restless and often lonely existence.  Perhaps hidden in a secret compartment of a burnished cherrywood desk with ebony accents on the third floor of the Palazzo Primoli, Of Curses and Beauty is kept, admired and reread by the museum’s docents, but otherwise kept under wraps, the true nature of Mario Praz jealously guarded. While we are unable at this juncture to properly review it, we eagerly await its discovery and eventual publication.